With just five months to go before the general elections scheduled for November 30, the presidential candidate of the Libre Party, Rixi Moncada, has sparked a wave of reactions in Honduras after her harsh criticism of the Catholic Church and evangelical churches, two of the most influential institutions in the country. Her statements, which place her in open confrontation with these religious organizations, could have a high electoral cost in the context of a tense political and social landscape.
Claims by Moncada: a campaign targeting the churches
In various public declarations, Moncada alleged that religious figures are simply spokespersons for the “ten oligarchic families” who, she stated, hold control over the country’s power. The presidential contender asserted that both priests and pastors are influencing their followers to advance a political agenda opposed to the present administration, which, according to her, weakens democracy and encourages social division.
This attack on churches, which have traditionally enjoyed great credibility among the Honduran population, prompted a swift response from religious leaders. The Committee of Bishops of the Catholic Church and several evangelical organizations called for a demonstration in defense of democracy and peace, warning that such statements not only deepen political division but also distance Moncada from a possible victory in the presidential elections.
Reactions and warnings: the electoral cost of challenging the churches
Political analysts have pointed out that Moncada’s words could have devastating effects on his election campaign.
According to Leonardo Pineda, an expert in public opinion, “messing with the faith of the people is electoral suicide,” as around 85 to 90% of Hondurans identify as Christian, and the majority continue to attend church. Pineda emphasizes that in a country where trust in politicians is at very low levels, religious sectors remain one of the most credible sources for citizens.
This area, traditionally crucial for winning elections in Honduras, might turn into a significant challenge for Moncada. In this context, several political analysts have concurred that confronting the churches directly during an election year is not just an ill-advised approach, but also a risky maneuver, as it distances a substantial segment of voters.
Stress on social networks and obstacles for Moncada’s election effort
The discussion has spread across social platforms and news outlets, with clips of Moncada’s remarks frequently circulating in conversations. The anger of users is evident, as numerous individuals perceive the clash with the churches as a frantic attempt by a campaign that is trying to find its path. The backlash on social platforms and in different media sources is on par with the backing from churches, who have come together to denounce what they see as a “politics of division and antagonism.”
Experts in political marketing and public opinion caution that the harm inflicted on Moncada’s reputation may be permanent. In a nation where the religious community has been key to the electoral achievements of other parties, the appeals for unity from religious figures appear to have left the candidate isolated during a crucial period.
A strategic shift or the inevitable downfall of LIBRE?
As the elections approach, a common concern is whether Moncada can adjust her approach or if her disputes with religious institutions will determine the outcome of her campaign. The harshest critics argue that it is improbable for the scenario to change, as the division caused by her remarks might have permanently distanced crucial parts of her prospective electorate.
Ultimately, the November election battle is shaping up to be a confrontation not only between political forces, but also between the religious beliefs of the Honduran people and the strategy of a party that seems to have chosen a risky path. With the power of the churches mobilizing against him, Moncada may have put LIBRE at a disadvantage that could prove decisive at the polls.