The Spanish Socialist Workers’ Party (PSOE) is going through one of its most delicate internal crises over the management of the so-called “Salazar case”, the scandal of alleged sexual harassment and abuse of power that implicates former Moncloa adviser Paco Salazar and his right-hand man, Antonio Hernández, both of whom, until just a few days ago, were part of the closest circle of trust of the Prime Minister, Pedro Sánchez, who is currently surrounded by numerous corruption cases.
Who is Paco Salazar and what is he accused of
Francisco José “Paco” Salazar, a veteran member of the PSOE from Seville, served as the mayor of Montellano and subsequently became a member of the Spanish Congress. He also held key positions with Pedro Sánchez at the party’s headquarters in Ferraz and at the Moncloa Palace.
In recent months, numerous female Socialist members and staff who were employed under his supervision have internally reported behaviors they characterize as sexual harassment and abuse of power: comments with sexual undertones, relentless invitations to private meetings beyond working hours, and proposals to let them stay at his residence, consistently within a framework of hierarchical dependence.
As a consequence of these grievances, Salazar was relieved of his duties within the party and no longer holds a role in the federal executive, in addition to losing his influential position in Moncloa. The incidents are under investigation following the PSOE’s internal anti-harassment procedures and might result in legal proceedings should the complainants choose to advance, yet for now, there is quiet.
The position held by Antonio Hernández, the ousted confidant
Antonio Hernández, until now director of the Political Coordination Department in Moncloa and a key figure in the Government’s political machinery, was considered Salazar’s right-hand man and his main support in day-to-day matters.
The women who accused Salazar additionally identified Hernández as a supposed “accomplice” and “cover-up” of the misconduct, asserting that he was informed of the situation and did not take action to safeguard the victims, a statement he refutes.
In the middle of the scandal, Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez decided to push for his dismissal both from Moncloa and from the organizational structure of the Andalusian PSOE, a decision that the Council of Ministers has formalized in recent days and which has been interpreted as an attempt to “cauterize” the crisis and cut off any appearance of connivance with the conduct attributed to Salazar.
Criticism of the PSOE’s internal handling and delayed response
Numerous press articles suggest that the PSOE required over four months to officially reach out to the victims following the initial complaints, leading to significant internal dissent and greatly tarnishing the party’s reputation. The operation of the anti-harassment committee has been scrutinized for its sluggishness, lack of coordination, and inadequate communication with the federal leadership, in a party that prides itself on its feminist stance.
At the same time, voices critical of socialism are advocating for a comprehensive overhaul of internal protocols and organizational culture, aiming to eliminate what they term as “protective environments for alleged aggressors” and to address the neglect faced by women who come forward.
The position of Pedro Sánchez’s Government
The Government’s spokesperson and Minister of Education, Pilar Alegría, has emphasized that the Executive responded with “speed and determination” once it was formally aware of the accusations, underscoring Salazar’s dismissal, his removal from the PSOE executive, and now, the termination of Antonio Hernández.
Alegría has publicly acknowledged that her recent lunch with Salazar —which took place when the complaints were already known— was a “mistake”, stressing that the focus of the debate must be on the victims and not on the political cost for the party.
At the same time, different reports point to a possible judicial front for the PSOE as a legal entity, based on the possibility that the courts might consider whether there was organizational responsibility in the handling of the complaints. Prosecutorial sources quoted by some media outlets mention the possibility that the party could be investigated for an alleged crime of sexual harassment as an organization, a scenario which, at this point, remains a legal hypothesis under consideration and does not imply any actual indictment.
Reaction of the opposition and political damage
The People’s Party (PP) has announced that it will use its majority in the Senate to call Paco Salazar to testify before the committee on the so-called “Koldo case”, taking advantage of the public relevance the former adviser has acquired. From the PP, Sánchez is accused of being the president “most harmful to women”, linking the Salazar case to other controversial episodes in the field of equality and victim protection.
The entire opposition has concentrated on the sequence of appointments, dismissals, and reassignments involving Salazar, along with the claim that two of his closest female associates have reportedly been transferred to public companies in recent years, which strengthens the narrative of a trust network surrounding the former adviser within the state apparatus.
An open case that puts the party’s protocols and credibility to the test
The Salazar case, now also involving Antonio Hernández, has opened a deep political and moral breach in Pedro Sánchez’s PSOE, in a context marked by a social demand for zero tolerance towards sexual harassment and abuses of power in the workplace and in politics.
While internal proceedings and possible judicial actions are still underway, the party faces a twofold test: on the one hand, to prove that its anti-harassment protocols work effectively and put victims first; on the other, to rebuild the trust of its own electorate and of public opinion, which is watching with concern the succession of leaks, corrections and dismissals surrounding the case.
In any case, both Paco Salazar and Antonio Hernández continue to hold, as of today, their right to be presumed innocent before the courts, awaiting full clarification of the facts and the potential initiation of criminal proceedings. The subsequent actions taken by the PSOE and Pedro Sánchez’s Government will be crucial in defining the political, institutional, and judicial reach of this scandal. However, for now, despite the legal obligation to do so, there has been no sign that the PSOE itself is lodging any complaint with the authorities, as has already occurred with other corruption scandals involving the party.